Re: Why Literals should be unique and why this is a serious issue

• From: Andreas Andreakis <andreas.andreakis@gmx.de>
• Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:14:38 +0100
• To: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>
• CC: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
• Message-ID: <437EECFE.2020008@gmx.de>

Hi Leight,


thanks for you reply.

You are absolutetly right and Im allready aware about the 
FunctionalInverseProperties.

But, since I think the same-concept-dublication problem is a 
fountamental problem, there should also be an appropriate functionality 
even in RDFS(S) and not only in owl (full).
Thats why I used rdf in the example code.

cheers,
Andreas


Leigh Dodds schrieb:

> You can, using Inverse Functional Properties:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#InverseFunctionalProperty-def
>
> To define a literl as being InverseFunctional you have to use OWL Full.
> But the support is already there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> L.
>
>

Received on Saturday, 19 November 2005 09:15:47 UTC