Re: Why Literals should be unique and why this is a serious issue

Hi Leight,

thanks for you reply.

You are absolutetly right and Im allready aware about the 

But, since I think the same-concept-dublication problem is a 
fountamental problem, there should also be an appropriate functionality 
even in RDFS(S) and not only in owl (full).
Thats why I used rdf in the example code.


Leigh Dodds schrieb:

> You can, using Inverse Functional Properties:
> To define a literl as being InverseFunctional you have to use OWL Full.
> But the support is already there.
> Cheers,
> L.

Received on Saturday, 19 November 2005 09:15:47 UTC