- From: Yuzhong Qu <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:06:53 +0800
- To: "Jeremy Wong" <50263336@student.cityu.edu.hk>
- Cc: "SWIG" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Just a caveat for using rdf:first in restriction. It beyonds the scope of OWL DL. Yuzhong Qu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Wong" <50263336@student.cityu.edu.hk> To: "l" <linst@yourw.com.cn> Cc: "semantic-web" <semantic-web@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:14 AM Subject: Re: Re: Re: how to describe the range of this kind of property Hi l, What is the consequence if you can define the rdfs:range of the module:composedBy property? Check out this one.. I am not sure if it works with your reasoner either... <rdf:Property rdf:ID="composedBy"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#PersonList"/> </rdf:Property> <owl:Class rdf:ID="PersonList"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#List"/> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#first"/> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="#person"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> <rdfs:subClassOf> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#rest"/> <owl:allValuesFrom rdf:resource="#PersonList"/> </owl:Restriction> </rdfs:subClassOf> </owl:Class> Let me know your results, anyway. Jeremy ----- Original Message ----- From: "l" <linst@yourw.com.cn> To: "Jeremy Wong" <50263336@student.cityu.edu.hk> Cc: "semantic-web" <semantic-web@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 12:16 AM Subject: Re: Re: Re: how to describe the range of this kind of property > hi,Jeremy Wong£¡ > What do you mean by "allow various classes"? Actually, there is only > one class, but there are one or more individuals of this class in this > collection. > Just as you said,"It is *possible* to use rdf:parseType="Collection" > even you have defined the rdfs:range as #person", in some owl validator, > it is just ok, but in some other validator, it causes a warning. In any > case, it is logical wrong. > > It is really a "must" for me. I choosed s:student from > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210 just as an example. > Actually, in my ontology concerning module, i want to illustrate the > relation that one module is module:composedBy 1 or 2 or 3 or more > submodules. And my question is how to describe the range of > module:composedBy. > > Thank you for helps. And here in china it is late in night. Hope you > and others could give me more suggestions and i would see and reply next > morning. > > regards. > > > ======= 2005-03-30 23:51:30 ÄúÔÚÀ´ÐÅÖÐдµÀ£º======= > >>Hi l, >> >>You'd better not to define the range of your property if you allow various >>classes for the range of the s:students property. It is not a must to >>define >>the range, anyway. >> >>It is *possible* to use rdf:parseType="Collection" even you have defined >>the >>rdfs:range as #person. However, it means that the anonymous Collection is >>#person which is logically incorrect. >> >> >>Jeremy >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "l" <linst@yourw.com.cn> >>To: "Jeremy Wong" <50263336@student.cityu.edu.hk> >>Cc: "semantic-web" <semantic-web@w3.org> >>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:41 PM >>Subject: Re: Re: how to describe the range of this kind of property >> >> >>> Jeremy Wong,hi£¡ >>> >>> thanks. >>> I prefer the first way. But how to describe the range of s:students? As >>> i >>> said, if it is <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#person"/>, it is impossible to >>> use rdf:parseType="Collection" after s:students. >>> regrads. >>> >>> ======= 2005-03-30 23:32:57 ÄúÔÚÀ´ÐÅÖÐдµÀ£º======= >>> >>>>l, >>>> >>>>There are 2 ways to say that there are 3 students in the course. >>>> >>>>A) Count the number of elements in the collection. Note that a >>>>collection >>>>is >>>>closed, i.e. no more elements can be added. >>>> >>>>B) Add a property like "studentCount" to describe that there are 3 >>>>students. >>>> >>>> >>>>Jeremy >>>> >>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>From: "l" <linst@yourw.com.cn> >>>>To: "semantic-web" <semantic-web@w3.org> >>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:12 PM >>>>Subject: how to describe the range of this kind of property >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> It really confuse me. >>>>> In http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210, there is a >>>>> example: >>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/courses/6.001"> >>>>> <s:students rdf:parseType="Collection"> >>>>> <rdf:Description >>>>> rdf:about="http://example.org/students/Amy"/> >>>>> <rdf:Description >>>>> rdf:about="http://example.org/students/Mohamed"/> >>>>> <rdf:Description >>>>> rdf:about="http://example.org/students/Johann"/> >>>>> </s:students> >>>>> </rdf:Description> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My question is how to describe the range of property s:students.. Below >>>>> is >>>>> a wrong description: <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#person"/>. This >>>>> description is not compatible with above example. With this range >>>>> description, I could only use s:students like this: >>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/courses/6.001"> >>>>> <s:students rdf:about="http://example.org/students/Amy"/> >>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/courses/6.001"> >>>>> <s:students rdf:about="http://example.org/students/Mohamed"/> >>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/courses/6.001"> >>>>> <s:students rdf:about="http://example.org/students/Johann"/> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But actually, I want to say that this course has and only has 3 >>>>> students, >>>>> no more, no less. >>>>> How could I do. >>>>> Please help. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and regards >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ¡¡ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ >>>>> ¡¡ >>>>> ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = >>> >>> >>> ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Ö >>> Àñ£¡ >>> >>> >>> ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡l >>> ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡linst@yourw.com.cn >>> ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2005-03-30 >>> >>> > > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = > > > ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Ö > Àñ£¡ > > > ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡l > ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡linst@yourw.com.cn > ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2005-03-31 > >
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2005 01:03:36 UTC