- From: James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, reto@gmuer.ch
Reto, Very nice and interesting CMS. I have a simular idea; although, it isn't a server side app. What does WYMIWYG stand for? What You Make Is What You Get? > If I understand http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-URI-reference > correctly, the following graph contains two statements : > <snip> Yes. Even if they were the same URIs, though, there would _still be two statements_! They would just be duplicates, but that is allowed in RDF's data model. > Does it make sense that "Two RDF URI references are equal if and only if > they compare as equal, character by character, as Unicode strings.", Yes. That is correct. > wouldn't it cause less problems to say "Two RDF URI references are equal > if and only if the resolve to the same URI". The problem is that two RDF URI references don't have to "resolve" to anything! They could point to a resource that is not network retrievable, for example. For this reason, I think the tag URI scheme is a good idea for most URIs. See <http://taguri.org> for more info on that scheme. > I'm asking because I'm implementing and RDF based CMS [1] where GET and > MGET requests are answered according of the properties the requested > resource has in the model and I have no way to find out whether the user > requested http://gmuer.ch/%C3%BC or http://example.org/��. Take a look at the SPARQL protocol, which provides a standard way of using HTTP to get RDF information. See <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/> for more information. -- Jimmy Cerra https://nemo.dev.java.net __________________________________ Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html
Received on Sunday, 5 June 2005 02:52:32 UTC