- From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:08:39 -0400
- To: "Ivor Tillier" <ivor@ivor.net>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Ivor --
You wrote,,,
...could anyone suggest how I might approach the inferencing/querying
engine side of things?
The examples
http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/CriticalPath1.agent
http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent
http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/ProcessSpecificationLanguage1.agent
http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/Oil-IndustrySupplyChain1.agent
illustrate a hopefully useful approach.
Some general thoughts behind the approach are in
http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/paper/19
Hope this helps.
-- Adrian
INTERNET BUSINESS LOGIC (R)
www.reengineeringllc.com
Adrian Walker
Reengineering LLC
PO Box 1412
Bristol
CT 06011-1412 USA
Phone: USA 860 583 9677
Cell: USA 860 830 2085
Fax: USA 860 314 1029
At 06:55 PM 7/24/2005 +0100, you wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>Am I correct in saying that there aren't any ontology tools that support
>processes, in the sense of providing a visual display of tasks within a
>project (as in a Gantt chart)?
>
>The idea being that not only inputs (e.g. available resources or people)
>into a project may vary, but also other factors (e.g. requirements) and
>this will reflect the chart. If one was to implement this, could anyone
>suggest how I might approach the inferencing/querying engine side of
>things?
>
>Process ontologies seem to be related to web services. Is there a
>particular reason for this or is it simply that sequencing is an
>important aspect of connecting to multiple web services?
>
>Finally, I have found process.owl, is this a defintive file and/or does
>anyone know of any supplementary ontologies?
>
>Best wishes
>Ivor
>-----------------------------------------
>Ivor Tillier
>http://www.ivor.net
>-----------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2005 21:09:07 UTC