- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:22:18 -0400
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Danny, Thank you very much for your answer. Le 05-07-21 à 18:40, Danny Ayers a écrit : > mod_enclosure [1] starts with: > > <enc:enclosure rdf:resource="http://foo.bar/baz.mp3" > enc:type="audio/mpeg" enc:length="65535"/> > > Supporting it in apps isn't a problem either. But very few of the > developers in the field see any reason for doing anything other than > the de facto standard (*cough*) : > > <enclosure url="http://foo.bar/baz.mp3" length="65535" type="audio/ > mpeg" /> > > So I think we're probably stuck with it for another year or two yet. I wonder if a transition strategy or a more complete specification would help. > But it's not all bad news, I think 'simple' RSS in the wild has been > getting progressively cleaner. I imagine the desire for people to get > their material on iTunes and to aggregate Yahoo! Media RSS will act as > fairly powerful validation processes for RSS+Media XML. If the XML is > half-decent, RDF is but a stylesheet away. Yes indeed. > Atom (now effectively finished at 1.0 [2]) may not be RDF/XML, but it > does have significantly better coverage of the foundation layers of > the cake (URIs, XML, xmlns, Unicode, trifle sponge...) and a > semi-constrained extension mechanism that may help with RDF mapping. > What will happen with Atom + media is anyone's guess, but now would be > the time to influence things. Yes the extension mechanism is defined in Atom, which is really good somehow. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 19:22:00 UTC