- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:27:56 -0500
- To: Russell Duhon <fugu13@mac.com>
- CC: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
Russell Duhon wrote: > snip > Personally, I view RDF as more along > the lines of Python or similar important dynamic, strongly typed > languages -- we can play fast and loose with it in many ways, using > duck typing, but the types are still there to exploit when useful. > This seems like a reasonble position, except that being able to ignore the types when you want to makes them optional doesn't it? And playing fast and loose doesn't sound like what I recall of strong typing! --Frank
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 22:26:45 UTC