- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:42:02 +0100
- To: Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
I wrote the following a few months ago: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/bblfish?entry=know_your_end_user On 14 Dec 2005, at 16:13, Xavier Noria wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2005, at 15:51, Henry Story wrote: > >> It won't emerge by speaking about it. >> It won't emerge first by adding annotations or any distributed >> metadata scheme as that requires a lot of people to agree on many >> things first. >> The best way to start it, is to open up a database of valuable >> data to a SPARQL end point with a good ontology. > > Absolutely. I am somewhat new to SW, but looks like there are > enough standards to start somehow with the plumbing. > > Taking this pragmatic approach which I share: are you thinking on > publishing ontologies (that is schema + instances) as such for > others to use? Or are you thinking in RDF-but-private backends > accessible with some kind of front-end? In my view the former seems > sctrictly closer to the semantic web itself but needs third-party > applications to leverage the data, the latter uses semantic web > related technologies but if everything is server-side depending on > the data a relational database may be enough, that is, the > technology itself may not be differential, or in any case being > server-side might be not be considered proper semantic web. > > -- fxn >
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 18:48:52 UTC