- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 05:08:18 -0400 (EDT)
- To: larsga@ontopia.net
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
I am puzzled why you say that if RDF can be transformed into Q with no loss of information then OWL/RDFS semantics can be ported to it. Both RDFS and OWL have a non-trivial semantics that may not survive the changes from simple statements to identified and situated statements very well. Do you have a fully-worked-out version of RDFS and OWL in this arena? Similarly, how do the RDF semantic conditions play into the story, particularly with the inclusion of contexts in the Q model? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 09:08:29 UTC