Hi Frank! Thanks for the help! It seems to me that we have a divide between two Semantic Webs: * RDF + RDFS + OWL Full (the cumulation I mentioned: "OWL Full contains all the OWL language constructs and provides free, unconstrained use of RDF constructs.") * OWL DL and its subset OWL Lite There is a lot in OWL DL that I like, but using OWL DL means de facto throwing away RDF-RDFS (right?), and that seems not so nice. It appears to me that this divide now forces us to make a very important choice between the two, where I had expected a smooth upgrade path RDF > RDFS > OWL Lite > OWL DL > OWL Full. Too logical (or naive), I presume. Is there any way, e.g. a header, to tell the software whether you work in DL or in Full? Is there anything written on a migration path between the two in either direction? Regards, Hans
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 20:31:36 UTC