Re: Rule-based approach to conclude owl:intersectionOf

> Here is an example of the situation...
>  
> # only 5 facts in total
> <#X> rdf:type <#A> .
> <#Y> rdf:type <#A> , <#B> .
> <#Z> rdf:type <#A> , <#C> .
>  
> =>
>  
> # conclusion of the 5 facts
> <#X> rdfs:subClassOf <#Y> , <#Z> .

This doesn't make any sense. #X is of type #A -- how do you then 
conclude that #X is a class? Or that it is related to #Y in any way?

Did you mean the following?

<#X> owl:unionOf ( <#A> )
<#Y> owl:unionOf ( <#A>, <#B> )
<#Z> owl:unionOf ( <#A>, <#C> )

Chris

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 11:45:48 UTC