Re: Review of Actions

The issue was we needed ExprSingle as the content of get() to ensure that if there are a pair, they had to be bracketed, to avoid confusion with a two-argument function call
John Lumley
Sent from my iPad

> On 1 Oct 2025, at 17:24, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> 
> [ ] QT4CG-133-01: MK to correct the use of “Expr” in examples for get()
> Looking at the current text:
> 
> * In 4.6.4.3,  "A further example: descendant::(get(#para) | text())   " looks odd, but it appears to be valid. I don't see any other problems. Perhaps it was already fixed.
> 
> I don't see anything to do here. ACTION CLOSED.

Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2025 17:31:12 UTC