Re: Issues proposed for rejection

In reviewing proposals that were ripe for closure, I found some where "rejection" is the wrong word: they should be closed not because we reject the idea, but for other reasons, for example that the discussion on the issue has been so wide-ranging that the only way of taking things forward is to raise a new issue with concrete proposals. I therefore changed the text of the label to say "Proposed for Closure with No Action".

Michael Kay
Saxonica

> On 9 Jun 2023, at 10:31, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
> 
> I have created a new label "Proposed for Rejection" to attach to issues that I think the WG should consider closing with no further action. We need to reduce the number of open issues and some of them I think have no chance of passing in their current form.
> 
> I suggest adding the issues in this category to the agenda so that we can make a decision on them.
> 
> Of course this is a democratic process and anyone is free to remove the label, for example if they think they can produce a concrete proposal that will achieve consensus.
> 
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica

Received on Friday, 9 June 2023 10:40:19 UTC