- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 14:17:26 -0600
- To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Cc: public-xslt-40@w3.org
Perhaps we should just have a 'Consent agenda' section on each week's agenda, with a list of PRs that will be discussed if need be or accepted silently if no one feels the need for discussion. At the beginning of the meeting, the chair asks if any of the items on the consent agenda need discussion; if so, that item is taken up at an appropriate point in the agenda, and all other PRs not mentioned as needing discussion are adopted by general consent (hence the name). Michael Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com> writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hi folks, > > I’ve been trying to experiment with ways to streamline our work. Any > item discussed in a meeting carries with it a minimum amount of > overhead. I don’t want to impede discussion of items where it’s needed, > but if we don’t spend that overhead on items where it isn’t, we can get > more useful work done. > > In PR #449, Mike has applied the changes we requested during review of > PR #420. It has one approval and it looks fine to me. > > Unless someone objects in the next day or two, I propose to merge it > without further discussion. > > Be seeing you, > norm -- C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC http://blackmesatech.com
Received on Monday, 24 April 2023 20:20:38 UTC