- From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:09:45 +0000
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: Public XSLWG <public-xsl-wg@w3.org>, Public Joint XSLT XQuery XPath <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:53:17AM +0000, Michael Kay wrote: > It???s a W3C convention / requirement that we publish namespace documents for each namespace that we define. > > We???re in danger of getting ourselves into version & variant problems on these, and I???m not sure what the policy is. The policy for changes in namespace URIs is here: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri#Policy > The current public version of > > http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/ <http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/> > > includes functions defined in XPath 3.1 and in XSLT 3.0, and it also includes the analyze-string schema (but not yet the json-to-xml schema). It's OK to update that, independently of the XQuery WG, as long as we don't break the Joint specs. > http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/map <http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/map> > > returns ???insufficient access privileges???. Fixed (now all public) > Both the above namespaces are under ???joint control??? and we need to be clear about who takes responsibility for updating them when new specs are released. Both groups can update. A friendly warning on the joint list is appropriate if we do so for XSLT-only matter. > The same also applies to the collation URIs that we define; for some reason we publish ???namespace documents??? for these even though they are not namespaces. > I think it can be coordinated on the joint mailing list. -- Carine Bournez /// W3C Europe
Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 10:09:48 UTC