- From: Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:18:14 +0100
- To: public-xsl-query@w3.org
On 11/05/2016 10:44, Michael Kay wrote:
> Well, (a) that's clearly the way the spec is written, and (b) I doubt anyone considered the alternative before, and (c) the alternative is probably acceptable, but is it worth changing?
>
> It's worth adding a test case though.
I notice that in SaxonHE, the result of
[1, 2, 3]?[1,2]
is
(1,2)
i.e. it has done
for $k in fn:data([1, 2])
return .($k)
I suspect that at this stage, it really would be wiser to make the
specification match this behaviour, otherwise the type checking can get
quite hairy.
I will raise a bug report.
Cheers,
Tim
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2016 10:18:45 UTC