Re: Atomization in Unary Lookup

Well, (a) that's clearly the way the spec is written, and (b) I doubt anyone considered the alternative before, and (c) the alternative is probably acceptable, but is it worth changing?

It's worth adding a test case though.

Michael Kay


> On 11 May 2016, at 09:59, Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Could I please just check that for
> 
> ? ParenthesizedExpr
> 
> It is intentional that atomization happens as
> 
> for $k in KS
> return .(fn:data($k))
> 
> and not
> 
> for $k in fn:data(KS)
> return .($k)
> 
> In the former case
> 
> [1, 2, 3]?[1,2]
> 
> is an error, while in the latter case it would return (1, 2).
> 
> Thanks,
>    Tim
>