On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 21:33 +0000, Michael Kay wrote: > > > > > > Agreed. The Working Group voted unanimously to progress to PR, > > which means we declared that we have finished the 3.1 specs. A > > further round of CR is required to satisfy the process rules, but > > nothing other than minor editorial changes will be made to the > > documents now. > > > > We need to be a bit more open than that: publishing at CR status is > an opportunity for the public to comment on the changes we have made > since the last CR; but it's not an opportunity to comment on changes > that we DIDN'T make. Right. Well, people can comment, but the overall design isn't about to change at this stage I hope.. There are always new comments and new ideas coming in, but XQuery and the other XML specs are widely used in encvironments where a "living standard" isn't appropriate, and a fixed version and strict conformance are important. I'd not be opposed to seeing a document describing experiences and notes for a possible future XQuery, as long as it doesn't get in the way of the train :-) Even if the Working Group closes, the language itself is very much alive. LiamReceived on Thursday, 8 December 2016 02:17:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:43:21 UTC