- From: Benito van der Zander <benito@benibela.de>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:46:15 +0100
- To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liam@w3.org>, public-xsl-query@w3.org
Hi, so it is back to pre-CR? After the CR is before the CR? Perhaps this is an opportunity to add some new minor function/syntax extensions to 3.1 ? https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29356 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29355 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29869 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29393 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29428 If there are no plans for 3.2 it is the last chance. > So we'll republish on the 13th as CR. If you work quick, you can put the extension in before the 13th! Otherwise the syntax looks outdated before it is published :( Cheers, Benito On 12/07/2016 06:10 PM, Liam R. E. Quin wrote: > We had the transition call for moving XQuery 3.1, XPath 3.1, XQueryX > 3.1 and supporting specs to Proposed Recommendation. > > Because of the subsantive changes since the previous CR, the decision > was that we must republish the documents as candidate recommendations. > This is because the W3C patent policy allows patent holders to declare > that they have patents on the changes and to exclude them from the > royalty-free policy (in which case we have to go back and reconsider, > of course, what to do - I don't expect it to happen in this case!) > > The good news is that we have provisional approval to go forward to > proposed recommendation in January, provided that there are no more > substantive changes. > > So we'll republish on the 13th as CR. > > Liam > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 18:39:30 UTC