RE: ACTION 614-12: Smart Quotes

> > (literal elements for instance).  This is rather done in XQuery (or
> > XSLT, but XSLT already has such a mechanism).
> >
> 
> It’s actually about constructing strings rather than text nodes, but I think
> similar reasoning applies.
> 
> XPath is designed for embedding in other languages, and the problems of
> escaping special characters depend very much on the escaping conventions
> of the language in which it is embedded. A solution that works for one host
> language might work very badly for another.
> 

Ah, I missed this one. Please ignore my previous mail. But yes, this was precisely why I suggested *not* to use any syntax involving angle brackets. But since there seems to be consensus that it is not going to become part of XPath, that argument doesn't fly anymore ;). 

Cheers,
Abel

Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 07:40:37 UTC