- From: Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:40:04 +0200
- To: "'Michael Kay'" <mike@saxonica.com>, "'Florent Georges'" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Cc: "'Public Joint XSLT XQuery XPath'" <public-xsl-query@w3.org>
> > (literal elements for instance). This is rather done in XQuery (or > > XSLT, but XSLT already has such a mechanism). > > > > It’s actually about constructing strings rather than text nodes, but I think > similar reasoning applies. > > XPath is designed for embedding in other languages, and the problems of > escaping special characters depend very much on the escaping conventions > of the language in which it is embedded. A solution that works for one host > language might work very badly for another. > Ah, I missed this one. Please ignore my previous mail. But yes, this was precisely why I suggested *not* to use any syntax involving angle brackets. But since there seems to be consensus that it is not going to become part of XPath, that argument doesn't fly anymore ;). Cheers, Abel
Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 07:40:37 UTC