- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:57:27 -0000
- To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
I'd like to close ISSUE-10 today so we can make progress. My strong suspicion is that the pattern proposed earlier* based upon names in Python etc is going to provide the most interoperability with current databinding implementations, our criteria for a pattern to be "Basic". However, I recognise that we should go the extra mile to avoid disallowing i18n characters, especially since we are working within the W3C! I therefore propose we have at least two patterns, one to recognise simple names* for name="" and anothers to recognise more "interesting" names (unusual in terms of mainstream programming languages), I think we can use an XPath 2.0 match regex function to do this, and we have examples, here, which I'll add to our suite: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/testsuite/documents/names/names.xsd the "interesting" names can be more explicitly marked as "at risk" if required. Paul * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0007
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 14:57:41 UTC