I would hope so. Anthony (Tony) Julian HL7 Infrastructure and Messaging Committee Co-Chair(Formerly Control/Query) Day-Job: Mayo Clinic - Information Services e-mail ajulian@mayo.edu Phone 507-266-0958 Page 127-10700 -----Original Message----- From: public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pete Cordell Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:00 AM To: Databinding WG Subject: Re: ISSUE-58: anonymous complexType Original Message From: "Databinding Issue Tracker" <dean+cgi@w3.org> > We use the following pattern in our schemas: > > <xs:element name="foo"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element .../> > <xs:element .../> > </xs:sequence> > <xs:complexType> > </xs:element> I wonder whether this should be a basic pattern? Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) =============================================Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 14:30:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:56 UTC