- From: Julian, Anthony J. <ajulian@mayo.edu>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:30:00 -0500
- To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>, Databinding WG <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
I would hope so.
Anthony (Tony) Julian
HL7 Infrastructure and Messaging Committee Co-Chair(Formerly Control/Query)
Day-Job:
Mayo Clinic - Information Services
e-mail ajulian@mayo.edu
Phone 507-266-0958
Page 127-10700
-----Original Message-----
From: public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pete Cordell
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:00 AM
To: Databinding WG
Subject: Re: ISSUE-58: anonymous complexType
Original Message From: "Databinding Issue Tracker" <dean+cgi@w3.org>
> We use the following pattern in our schemas:
>
> <xs:element name="foo">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element .../>
> <xs:element .../>
> </xs:sequence>
> <xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
I wonder whether this should be a basic pattern?
Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML to C++ data binding visit
http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
(or http://www.xml2cpp.com) =============================================
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 14:30:22 UTC