RE: ISSUE-58: anonymous complexType

I would hope so.
Anthony (Tony) Julian
HL7 Infrastructure and Messaging Committee Co-Chair(Formerly Control/Query)
Day-Job:
Mayo Clinic - Information Services
e-mail ajulian@mayo.edu 
Phone 507-266-0958
Page 127-10700 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pete Cordell
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:00 AM
To: Databinding WG
Subject: Re: ISSUE-58: anonymous complexType


Original Message From: "Databinding Issue Tracker" <dean+cgi@w3.org>

> We use the following pattern in our schemas:
> 
> <xs:element name="foo">
>  <xs:complexType>
>    <xs:sequence>
>      <xs:element .../>
>      <xs:element .../>
>    </xs:sequence>
>  <xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>

I wonder whether this should be a basic pattern?

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
                         for XML to C++ data binding visit
                         http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
                         (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) =============================================