- From: Peter Hendry <peter.hendry@capeclear.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:12:10 +0200
- To: Databinding WG <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>
The wrapped document/literal style favoured by .NET and now JAX-WS when doing code-2-wsdl generation requires the use of anonymous complex types to represent the arguments. The message part of the request and response point each point to a different element where that element contains an anonymous complexType with a sequence of elements as its child. This is a very widely used pattern and disallowing (or even recommending against it) would, in my view, be unwise as vendors that support wrapped document/literal will not be moving away from it. This applies to ISSUE-18 also. I would be surprised if any actively developed SOAP implementations do not fully support anonymous types. Pete Databinding Issue Tracker wrote: > ISSUE-58: anonymous complexType > > http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/issues/58 > > Raised by: George Cowe > On product: Advanced > > We use the following pattern in our schemas: > > <xs:element name="foo"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element .../> > <xs:element .../> > </xs:sequence> > <xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > > > > > > possibly related to ISSUE-18: Schema Authoring Styles > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 29 May 2006 12:12:22 UTC