Re: proposed update to XML Encryption 1.1 from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2013-02-07 (public-xmlsec@w3.org from February 2013)

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:26:22 +0000
To: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <mnystrom@microsoft.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1CB2E0B458B211478C85E11A404A2B270190A519@008-AM1MPN1-033.mgdnok.nokia.com>

Thanks for the quick replies Scott and Magnus, I've suggested the alternative change to Donald.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia

On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:13 PM, ext Cantor, Scott wrote:

>> Why not do this the other way around? We're close to publication, Eastlake's
>> document is still just a draft. He could easily switch.
> 
> I had some unimplemented constants defined that I think are still in released code, so I would favor that.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:27:01 UTC