RE: proposed update to XML Encryption 1.1 from Cantor, Scott on 2013-02-07 (public-xmlsec@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:13:33 +0000
To: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BA63CEAE152A7742B854C678D949138349086279@CIO-KRC-D1MBX01.osuad.osu.edu>

> Why not do this the other way around? We're close to publication, Eastlake's
> document is still just a draft. He could easily switch.

I had some unimplemented constants defined that I think are still in released code, so I would favor that.

-- Scott

Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:14:07 UTC