- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:19:34 +0000
- To: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Much thanks Pratik and Scott! I've updated the interop test report for XML Signature 1.1 accordingly, http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core1-interop/Overview.src.html This means we have completed interop on XML Signature 1.1, assuming we agree to remove OCSPResponse from XML Signature 1.1. I'll send a CfC on that. Regarding interop, do we need an interop test cases document for XML Signature 1.1 or is the wiki good enough? I note we are a bit inconsistent, having an interop test cases document for encryption, but not signature... regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair XML Security WG On Sep 12, 2012, at 2:09 PM, ext Cantor, Scott wrote: > I've successfully tested these interop vectors as follows: > > DEREncodedKeyValue (both EC and RSA) - Apache Santuario-C++ > > KeyInfoReference, X509Digest - Shibboleth and OpenSAML > > The latter two weren't strictly evaluated but I reproduced the X509Digest > material by consuming the same keypair and successfully processed the > KeyInfoReference after I copied it into a SAML document. > > I should be able to report additional interop in Java (not done by me) > shortly, but this should be sufficient for now. > > -- Scott > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 19:29:13 UTC