- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:22:47 +0200
- To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
- Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAAK2GfH_Tnz-A8p4xu35YN4svcCUrio-q1oUHQTvC+N4+ikrAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Frederick, Thanks for this lightning answer ! On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:49 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > Mohamed > > The working group is currently focusing on moving the 1.1 specifications > forward to recommendation as noted in the Roadmap [1]. > > Fair enough > If there is interest in moving the 2.0 specifications forward then we > will need implementations and interop to do so. Are you able to contribute > to 2.0 interop testing for XML Signature 2.0? > Probably XML Signature 2.0 is a best too big for me and I will need to hang around to learn a bit more about XML Signature to be helpful in any sense. My contributions if any would certainly be on either XPath side or Relax NG side. > > Do you see a case for moving C14N2 forward without progressing XML > Signature 2.0? > That's indeed an interesting question. I would certainly be more helpful on this side of the hill, but I don't have any strong hurry myself. If we can find few more folks interested than I will certainly be interested in helping moving it forward Best regards, Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 16:23:18 UTC