- From: Takuki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:51:23 -0700
- To: "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- CC: "member-exi-wg@w3.org" <member-exi-wg@w3.org>
Hi Frederick, One of our members took a look at the latest Canonical XML 2.0 draft. Although it appears to represent a leap from 1.0, it does not seem to address our desire to bypass altogether the textural XML representation in getting to the final hash value for signature. We, therefore, are considering that we may want to work on native EXI-canonicalization in the next WG term. I would like to know if there has been any discussion or interest had by XML Security WG based on our write-up [1] so far. I think that if there are enough interest, the two WGs would better be working on it together. [1] https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/EXI/wiki/EXISignature Thanks, -taki
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 22:23:28 UTC