- From: Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
The issue was raised on the last call and I took an action to investigate. I was looking for an answer not limited to the W3C. I got a prompt and helpful answer from Elaine Barker. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:tlr@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:21 AM > To: Hal Lockhart > Cc: Thomas Roessler; public-xmlsec@w3.org > Subject: Re: NIST Email Addresses > > > What's the context for this? They're a W3C member, and we > can certainly reach out to them through their AC > representative. Also, there are some other direct contacts, > depending on the topic. > > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) > > > > > > > > On 2011-09-27, at 15:58 +0100, Hal Lockhart wrote: > > > I have not found an authoritative email address for sending > technical comments and questions to NIST. Here are some possibilities. > > > > Their website says technical matters relating to the > website will be forwarded to the correct party from: > > > > webmaster-csrc@nist.gov > > > > ----- > > > > The recent request for review of Special Publication > 800-107 specifies sending comments to: > > > > Revised_SP-800-107_Comments@nist.gov , with Comments on > Revised_SP-800-107 in the subject line. > > > > I don't know if you can construct similar aliases > corresponding to other documents. > > > > ----- > > > > I have received requests for review from: > > > > ebarker@nist.gov > > > > with the suggestion of sending comments to that email > address. I have discovered that this is Elaine Barker, so I > am sending her an inquiry on where to send comments and questions. > > > > Hal > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2011 15:26:59 UTC