- From: <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 23:49:36 +0000
- To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
Dear Scott Cantor , The XML Security Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 1.1 published on 4 Feb 2010. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. Please review it carefully and let us know by email at public-xmlsec@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 8 October 2010. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the XML Security Working Group, Thomas Roessler W3C Staff Contact 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/008801cb5f1f$354c0330$9fe40990$@osu.edu 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xmldsig-core1-20100204/ ===== Your comment on 4.5.4 The X509Data Element: > Due to the ongoing problems with the X509IssuerSerial element, I would > ask > that a new X509Data alternative for representing certificates uniquely > by > hash be added to the 1.1 schema and specification, per the suggested > changes > here: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Sep/0052.html Working Group Resolution (LC-2424): RESOLUTION: group accepts scantor's proposal, to change both 1.1 and 2.0 specifications http://www.w3.org/2010/09/28-xmlsec-minutes.html#item05 Updated XML SIgnature 1.1 draft, schema and RELAX NG Schema. ----
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 23:49:38 UTC