- From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:54:09 +0100
- To: <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
- CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Correct, please take this as an amendment to the proposal I sent. We still need the reference for ConcatKDF. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Nov 16, 2010, at 8:04 PM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote: > Maybe this is what you meant below, but AFAICS, there is only one reference to SP800-56 in XML Encryption 1.1. that would be changed, namely the one in Section 5.6.4. The other ones should stay, I believe (i.e. we would *add* a reference to ECC-ALGS] and keep SP800-56)? > > -- Magnus > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] >> On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 4:40 PM >> To: public-xmlsec@w3.org >> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com >> Subject: Call for Consensus - Additional changes to XML Signature 1.1 and XML >> Encryption before Last Call publication >> >> All >> >> Magnus reminded me that at our 26 October meeting [1] we discussed changing >> the XML Signature 1.1 [SECG1] reference [2] to the Mcgrew reference [3]. I >> think we had general agreement but made no formal resolution. >> >> Specifically, the proposal is to replace [SECG1] with [ECC-ALGS] in the XML >> Signature 1.1 text, remove the SECG1 reference, and add the following >> reference: >> >> [ECC-ALGS] D. McGrew, K. Igoe, M. Salter. Fundamental Elliptic Curve >> Cryptography Algorithms, IETF Internet Draft, May 21, 2010, URL: >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-03.txt >> >> This email is a Call for Consensus to make this change in the XML Signature 1.1 >> draft before the next Last Call publication. >> >> In addition, we should make a similar change to XML Encryption. The proposal is >> to replace the [SP800-56A] reference [4] to [ECC-ALGS] as well, This is also a >> Call for Consensus for that change. >> If you think we should be making a different change to XML Encryption, please >> indicate what that should be in concrete terms - (e.g. if any change to algorithm >> text is needed). >> >> Please respond on the list to clearly indicate for support for one or both of these >> changes, or to indicate lack of approval, by this Friday, 19 November. >> >> We will delay Last Call publication to next Tuesday, 23 November, to >> incorporate these changes if approved. The three week Last Call for XML >> SIgnature 1.1 and XML Encryption will then end on 14 December. >> >> Please respond on the public list. Lack of response will be taken to indicate >> agreement with both proposed changes. >> >> Thank you >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia >> Chair XML Security WG >> >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Oct/att- >> 0041/minutes-2010-10-26.html#item04 >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core- >> 11/Overview.html#bib-SECG1 >> >> [3] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-03.txt >> >> [4] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core- >> 11/Overview.html#bib-SP800-56A >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 13:55:08 UTC