- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:45:33 -0400
- To: Makoto MURATA <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Makoto As a Last Call comment on XML Signature 1.1 you noted an ambiguity related to the SHA384 URI [1]. This was noted as a WG issue, ISSUE-191 [2] and also recorded as a Last Call issue (LC-2376) [3]. In order to maintain backward compatibility the WG resolved the issue by updating the document to consistently use http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more#sha384 as proposed [4] and minuted [5]. We included you in a message on March noting the resolution, but I have not heard any response [6]. I assume this means this resolution is acceptable, but for the record, can you please confirm that the resolution is acceptable to you? The latest Editors Draft has this correction [7]. Thank you. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair XML Security WG [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Mar/0052.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/191 [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmldsig-core1-20100204/2376 [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Mar/0074.html [5] http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#item03 [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Mar/0081.html [7] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview.html#sec-SHA-384
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 15:47:03 UTC