Re: Editorial update - generic hybrid ciphers

Magnus

I've updated a corrected draft - fixing the errors you noted as well  
as some additional internal references and table of contents formatting.

Thanks for looking at it so promptly.

Does the corrected draft look reasonable?

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/generic-hybrid-ciphers/Overview.html 
  (may require browser reload)

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:12 PM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote:

> Hi Frederick,
> Thanks for doing this. Unfortunately, I think some formatting was  
> lost in the conversion. In particular, the procedures describing  
> encryption/decryption for RSA-KEM and ECIES-KEM appear to have lost  
> all formatting.
>
> Also, there is a cross-reference missing in Section 4.2: "specified  
> in Section and ..." -> "specified in Section 4.3 and ..."
>
> Best,
> -- Magnus
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hirsch@nokia.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 5:26 PM
>> To: XMLSec WG Public List
>> Cc: Frederick Hirsch; Magnus Nystrom
>> Subject: Editorial update - generic hybrid ciphers
>>
>> for ease of maintenance, I've converted Generic Hybrid Ciphers to  
>> ReSpec,
>> placing in generic-hybrid-ciphers directory.
>>
>> Please review the latest draft for correctness:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/generic-hybrid-ciphers/Overview.html
>>
>> regards, Frederick
>>
>> Frederick Hirsch
>> Nokia
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2010 12:52:31 UTC