- From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:42:58 +0900
- To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
Is http://www.w3.org/2009/xmldsig11#ECKeyValue a key agreement algorithm? Probably, not. But I don't think that 5.6.4 is clear enough. What's the point of showing "identifiers" in non-algorithm elements? After all, XML uses qnames rather than identifiers containing fragment identifiers. Why does the XML Signature WG invent such identifiers? Is "the ECPublicKey element" in Encryption 1.1 and Signature 1.1 actually the ECKeyValue element? Cheers, Makoto
Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 06:43:30 UTC