Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken

Instead of linking to for-pay content, I still think it would be appropriate
to reference RFC 4270 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4270>


On 1/13/10 8:26 AM, "Frederick Hirsch" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:

> thanks, I'll add this to the reference unless anyone objects.
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:19 AM, ext Harold Lockhart wrote:
> 
>> Here is a link, but you have to pay to get more than the abstract.
>> 
>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/26vljj3xhc28ux5m/
>> 
>> Hal
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hirsch@nokia.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 3:58 PM
>>> To: Harold Lockhart
>>> Cc: Frederick Hirsch; public-xmlsec@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Reference for SHA-1 being broken
>>> 
>>> 
>>> thanks. Is there a URL?
>>> 
>>> regards, Frederick
>>> 
>>> Frederick Hirsch
>>> Nokia
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 12, 2010, at 3:45 PM, ext Harold Lockhart wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Well Wang's team has published a bunch of papers in 2005 and their
>>>> initial results merely weakened SHA-1, while completely breaking
>>>> MD-5. However this seems to be the paper which convinced everybody
>>>> that SHA-1 had to be phased out in fairly short order:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Wang, X., Yin, Y.L., Yu, H.: Finding Collisions in the Full SHA-1.
>>>> In Shoup, V., editor, Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO 2005,
>>>> 25th Annual International Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara,
>>>> California, USA,
>>>> August 14-18, 2005, Proceedings, volume 3621 of LNCS, pages 17­36.
>>>> Springer, 2005.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hal
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2010 16:50:01 UTC