- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:06:35 -0500
- To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, "Cynthia E. Martin" <cemartin@mitre.org>
Yes I thought about adding a note. I think that is ok since the document will continue revision. I'll go ahead and add it. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jan 8, 2010, at 11:06 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 8 Jan 2010, at 17:02, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > >> Yes, Does an obsoleted one indicate the new RFC to be used, I >> think so. > > The RFC index does, the (text version of) the RFC doesn't. There > are nicely instrumented pages on tools.ietf.org that make all this a > bit more navigable. > >> Regardless, it sounds like we should not make a change here to the >> reference until RFC 3161 is superseded. Referencing the update >> draft does not sound like the correct change. > > We could add a note that points at the draft. > >
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 17:07:15 UTC