- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:06:01 +0100
- To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, "Cynthia E. Martin" <cemartin@mitre.org>
On 8 Jan 2010, at 17:02, Frederick Hirsch wrote: > Yes, Does an obsoleted one indicate the new RFC to be used, I think so. The RFC index does, the (text version of) the RFC doesn't. There are nicely instrumented pages on tools.ietf.org that make all this a bit more navigable. > Regardless, it sounds like we should not make a change here to the reference until RFC 3161 is superseded. Referencing the update draft does not sound like the correct change. We could add a note that points at the draft.
Received on Friday, 8 January 2010 16:06:04 UTC