- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:41:21 -0500
- To: ext Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "'XMLSec WG Public List'" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
I completed the edits for both of these. I did not change the original dsig schema to include the comments however. Raised new ISSUE-188 since enc:Agreement does not appear to be defined. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:05 PM, ext Scott Cantor wrote: > Frederick Hirsch wrote on 2010-02-22: >> (2) added a warning to 4.5.3, >> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/ >> Overview.htm#sec- >> RetrievalMethod > > I might suggest moving the Note up next to the text discussing the > risks of > Transforms. Concretely, I suggest removing the Note you added, and > changing > the paragraph preceding the schema snippet to read: > > "Note that when referencing one of the defined KeyInfo types within > the same > document, or some remote documents, at least one Transform is > required to > turn an ID-based reference to a KeyInfo element into a child element > located > inside it. This is due to the lack of an XML ID attribute on the > defined > KeyInfo types. In such cases, use of KeyInfoReference is encouraged > instead, > see section 4.5.10." > >> (3) Added KeyInfoReference to the 1.1 schema. > > A small point, in section 4.5, we use comments inside the schema > snippet for > KeyInfo to note one of the new child elements. Seems like we should > put all > the new ones there or pull the comment for the one. May also apply > to the > underlying schema, I don't know if we edited that or not. > > -- Scott > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 14:42:25 UTC