- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:54:03 -0400
- To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, Magnus Nyström <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
Comments on latest Generic Hybrid Ciphers editors draft Substantive: (1) The document shortname is "xmlsec-generic-hybrid" and the namespace is "http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlsec-gh#" Should the shortname match the namespace (e.g. "xmlsec-generic- hybrid" vs "xmlsec-gh") ? (2) Should the namespace include 2009 or 2010 as the year (3) Do we need a note regarding the status of ECIES-KEM, currently mandatory, given the unclear ECC IPR status? Editorial (1) Introduction Change " usage of these algorithms in XML-based security applications" to " usage of these algorithms in conjunction with XML Security" (2) Section 2, Versions ... Replace "This namespace is also used as the prefix for identifiers defined by this specification." with "The use of the gh prefix in this document is an editorial convention - other prefix values could be associated with the namespace." (3) Section 4.2 s/combines/combine/ (4) Section 4.3 s/in, e.g., /in/ (5) Section 6, Examples Mark this section as informative. (6) Section 10 Schema Mark example as informative. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2010 19:54:59 UTC