- From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:40:21 -0500
- To: Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
- Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, ext Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com>
I fixed the spelling, reference and spacing in example in new update. Did not change namespace. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: > Comments on Derived Key draft, mostly editorial > > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/derived-key/derived-keys.html > > (1) There is no 2nd Edition of XML Encryption. For consistency with > the 2nd Edition XML Signature reference, I suggest the Derived Keys > draft reference the current XML Encryption Recommendation. (change > link in section 1 and update references) > > [XMLENC] XML Encryption Syntax and Processing , D. Eastlake, J. > Reagle, W3C Recommendation 10 December 2002,http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/ > . > > At some point we may want to add references to XML Signature 1.1 and > XML Encryption 1.1 as well. > > (2) We may remove the "01/" from the namespace in section 2 and > subsequent identifiers defined using that URL. > > (3) Section 2, replace "This document does not change the URI > associated" to "This document does not change the namespace URI > associated" > > (4) Section 3.2, replace "passpword" with "password" > > (5) Section 3.3 replace "hasing" with "hashing", "indictes" with > "indicates" > > (6) Section 7.1 replace "Amendement" with "Amendment" > > format example so text fits in box, e.g. Algorithm on new line. > Number lines? > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > >
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 20:41:03 UTC