- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:07:27 -0500
- To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, ext Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com>
Comments on Derived Key draft, mostly editorial http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/derived-key/derived-keys.html (1) There is no 2nd Edition of XML Encryption. For consistency with the 2nd Edition XML Signature reference, I suggest the Derived Keys draft reference the current XML Encryption Recommendation. (change link in section 1 and update references) [XMLENC] XML Encryption Syntax and Processing , D. Eastlake, J. Reagle, W3C Recommendation 10 December 2002,http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/ . At some point we may want to add references to XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 as well. (2) We may remove the "01/" from the namespace in section 2 and subsequent identifiers defined using that URL. (3) Section 2, replace "This document does not change the URI associated" to "This document does not change the namespace URI associated" (4) Section 3.2, replace "passpword" with "password" (5) Section 3.3 replace "hasing" with "hashing", "indictes" with "indicates" (6) Section 7.1 replace "Amendement" with "Amendment" format example so text fits in box, e.g. Algorithm on new line. Number lines? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 20:08:24 UTC