Re: XML Signature, Second Edition Editors Draft updated

On 2008-05-07 10:57:44 -0400, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> All of these changes were agreed by the WG explicitly on its last
> call, except for updating C14N11 reference to REC which I believe
> makes sense.

As far as I'm concerned, that is an obvious change that was
basically implied by citing the C14N PR in the Signature PER.

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 16:26:48 UTC