Re: Unnamed testcases

I don't see this problem with Firefox. It's probably a browser issue. 
I'll see if I can find the problem in the xml.

--Sean

Bruce Rich wrote:
> 
> It's hard to identify things that have no names...
> 
> But typically the first line of the table for a testcase contains a 
> testcase name.  None of the tables in section 3.3.4.1 have anything on 
> the first line of the table.
> In section 3.3.4.2, some of the tables do (first, second, third, fifth, 
> seventh, ninth) and some don't (fourth, sixth, eighth)
> 
> Bruce A Rich
> brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
> 
> 
> 
> *Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>*
> Sent by: Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM
> 
> 10/22/2007 01:00 PM
> 
> 	
> To
> 	Bruce Rich/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> cc
> 	xmldsigtechnical <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
> Subject
> 	Re: Unnamed testcases
> 
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Which ones don't have names?
> 
> --Sean
> 
> Bruce Rich wrote:
>  >
>  > In reviewing some of the tests at the end of the C14n11 interop testcase
>  > document, I noticed that some of the testcases were unnamed.
>  >
>  > It was unclear whether this lack of a name was intentional or
>  > accidental, and if it was intentional, what it might portend.
>  >
>  > The unnamed testcases are in section 3.3.4.1 and 3.3.4.2 (or at least
>  > the ones I noticed were).
>  >
>  > Referenced document =
>  > http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html
>  >
>  > Bruce A Rich
>  > brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
> 
>

Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 18:47:25 UTC