- From: Bruce Rich <brich@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:21:01 -0500
- To: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
- Cc: xmldsigtechnical <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 18:21:16 UTC
It's hard to identify things that have no names... But typically the first line of the table for a testcase contains a testcase name. None of the tables in section 3.3.4.1 have anything on the first line of the table. In section 3.3.4.2, some of the tables do (first, second, third, fifth, seventh, ninth) and some don't (fourth, sixth, eighth) Bruce A Rich brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM> Sent by: Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM 10/22/2007 01:00 PM To Bruce Rich/Austin/IBM@IBMUS cc xmldsigtechnical <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org> Subject Re: Unnamed testcases Which ones don't have names? --Sean Bruce Rich wrote: > > In reviewing some of the tests at the end of the C14n11 interop testcase > document, I noticed that some of the testcases were unnamed. > > It was unclear whether this lack of a name was intentional or > accidental, and if it was intentional, what it might portend. > > The unnamed testcases are in section 3.3.4.1 and 3.3.4.2 (or at least > the ones I noticed were). > > Referenced document = > http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html > > Bruce A Rich > brich at-sign us dot ibm dot com
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 18:21:16 UTC