- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:27:02 +0200
- To: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
(A bit earlier than usual, since it's Memorial Day week-end for the
US folks...)
29 May, 9-10am Eastern Time
(6-7am Pacific, 1400-1500 Dublin, 1500-1600 CET, 1600-1700 Crete)
See <http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Overview.html> for time in
other time zones.
Zakim Bridge:
+1.617.761.6200 conference code 965732# ('XMLSEC')
IRC Chat:
irc.w3.org (port 6665), #xmlsec
Web-based IRC (member-only):
<http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi>
Please note that attendance of XMLSEC WG telecons is restricted to
registered WG participants and persons invited by the chair.
Chair:
Thomas Roessler
Regrets:
Frederick Hirsch, Phill Hallam-Baker
1. Administrivia: scribe confirmation, next meeting
Giles is expected to scribe. The current scribe list is
at the end of this message.
Scribe Instructions:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html
Next meeting: PROPOSED for 5 June, Frederick to chair. Scribe
candidates are: Elisabetta Carrara, Konrad Lanz
2. Review and approval of last meeting's minutes
http://www.w3.org/2007/05/22-xmlsec-minutes
3. Action item review
We'll review action items that don't tie in with another agendum.
For the full list of open actions, see:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/open
ACTION-6 Konrad to share example for transform that depends on
information beyond the transform input nodeset.
Done,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0027.html
PROPOSED that Konrad summarize this thread in the wiki for
posterity.
ACTION-26 Thomas to draft CG note draft for submission to XML CG
[CONTINUE]
4. Workshop planning
ACTION-28 Hal to propose additional types of contributions for
workshop CFP
ACTION-29 Thomas to go through hosting requirements with Hal [DONE]
ACTION-30 Thomas to propose detailed timeline for CFP by mail
[DONE]
Current state of CFP, including timeline:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp.html
PROPOSED: To accept the time line and material content of CFP.
5. Current status of drafts: DSig Core
Current draft:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/changes.html
ACTION-19 Konrad to get test case for E01
Done:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0041.html
ACTION-31 Juan Carlos to propose rewording of "Reference
processing model" sentence on mailing list [DONE]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0035.html
ACTION-32 Sean to propose language for "validator" and
"generator" that is more in line with rest of rec\\'s style
Both done. PROPOSED updated language that pulls these together
and does a bit more wordsmithing is here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0042.html
ACTION-33 Thomas to change formatting of 4.4.3 note [DONE]
6. Algorithm URIs; dsig-usage note
ACTION-34 Konrad to verify that CR version of C14N11 has no
conformance-affecting changes against
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220/
If we are satisfied that the Last Call draft of C14N11 is
conformance-wise equivalent to the CR, then I propose that we
use the algorithm Identifiers that were defined in this note:
http://www.w3.org/TR/DSig-usage/
Otherwise, I propose to obtain new algorithm identifiers for the
CR version of C14N11.
In both cases, I propose to arrange for an update of said note.
7. Current status of drafts: Decryption Transform
Curent draft:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-decrypt.html
8. Interop testing, participation expectations
This agendum might be member-confidential.
ACTION-12 Contact participants in previous interop testing, on
Frederick Hirsch
Done:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0018.html
Review interop testing expectations:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/interop-interest/results
9. Test cases
i) Regression tests - original XML Signature and Decryption
Transform cases Action to review and summarize?
ii) test defined in new C14N11 example (as updated)
<http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509>
iii) E01 - see ACTION-19 Agreed at F2F that no tests needed for
E02-E05
iv) Action to review and summarize test for E06, test for base64
URI? Test exists but not well-defined?
v) Action to summarize dditional tests?
greg: test case for 1.0 as default see if 1.1 by mistake
<hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:base is
present
<hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:id is present
<fjh> thomas: generate sig over doc subset, must include c14n11
as final transform
<fjh> greg: new generators not rely on default c14n
<klanz2> Test case for conversion NodeSetData to OctetStreamData:
<klanz2> Use case: Generate a signature having a reference with
some xpath transform selecting NodeSetData
<klanz2> then we add a XSLT transform that clearly needs
OctetStreamData
<klanz2> Check on verification: if the resulting signature
actually made the use of c14n 1.1 explicit in the chain of transforms
10.
Any other business
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Scribe list
-----------
Elisabetta Carrara
Donald Eastlake
Giles Hogben (expected)
Konrad Lanz
Peter Lipp
Hal Lockhart
Ram Mohan
Anthony Nadalin
Chris Nautiyal
Rich Salz
Daniel Schutzer
Ed Simon
Andrew Sullivan
Panagiotis Trimintzios
Tarun Tyagi
Thomas Roessler (17 Apr 07)
Greg Whitehead (F2F 2 May 07 am)
Rob Miller (F2F 2 May 07 pm)
Gregory Berezowsky (F2F 3 May 07 am)
Sean Mullan (F2F 3 May 07 pm)
Juan Carlos Cruellas (15 May 2007)
Phillip Hallam-Baker (22 May 2007)
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 22:27:05 UTC