- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:27:02 +0200
- To: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
(A bit earlier than usual, since it's Memorial Day week-end for the US folks...) 29 May, 9-10am Eastern Time (6-7am Pacific, 1400-1500 Dublin, 1500-1600 CET, 1600-1700 Crete) See <http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Overview.html> for time in other time zones. Zakim Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 conference code 965732# ('XMLSEC') IRC Chat: irc.w3.org (port 6665), #xmlsec Web-based IRC (member-only): <http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi> Please note that attendance of XMLSEC WG telecons is restricted to registered WG participants and persons invited by the chair. Chair: Thomas Roessler Regrets: Frederick Hirsch, Phill Hallam-Baker 1. Administrivia: scribe confirmation, next meeting Giles is expected to scribe. The current scribe list is at the end of this message. Scribe Instructions: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html Next meeting: PROPOSED for 5 June, Frederick to chair. Scribe candidates are: Elisabetta Carrara, Konrad Lanz 2. Review and approval of last meeting's minutes http://www.w3.org/2007/05/22-xmlsec-minutes 3. Action item review We'll review action items that don't tie in with another agendum. For the full list of open actions, see: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/open ACTION-6 Konrad to share example for transform that depends on information beyond the transform input nodeset. Done, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0027.html PROPOSED that Konrad summarize this thread in the wiki for posterity. ACTION-26 Thomas to draft CG note draft for submission to XML CG [CONTINUE] 4. Workshop planning ACTION-28 Hal to propose additional types of contributions for workshop CFP ACTION-29 Thomas to go through hosting requirements with Hal [DONE] ACTION-30 Thomas to propose detailed timeline for CFP by mail [DONE] Current state of CFP, including timeline: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp.html PROPOSED: To accept the time line and material content of CFP. 5. Current status of drafts: DSig Core Current draft: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/ http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/changes.html ACTION-19 Konrad to get test case for E01 Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0041.html ACTION-31 Juan Carlos to propose rewording of "Reference processing model" sentence on mailing list [DONE] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0035.html ACTION-32 Sean to propose language for "validator" and "generator" that is more in line with rest of rec\\'s style Both done. PROPOSED updated language that pulls these together and does a bit more wordsmithing is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0042.html ACTION-33 Thomas to change formatting of 4.4.3 note [DONE] 6. Algorithm URIs; dsig-usage note ACTION-34 Konrad to verify that CR version of C14N11 has no conformance-affecting changes against http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220/ If we are satisfied that the Last Call draft of C14N11 is conformance-wise equivalent to the CR, then I propose that we use the algorithm Identifiers that were defined in this note: http://www.w3.org/TR/DSig-usage/ Otherwise, I propose to obtain new algorithm identifiers for the CR version of C14N11. In both cases, I propose to arrange for an update of said note. 7. Current status of drafts: Decryption Transform Curent draft: http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-decrypt.html 8. Interop testing, participation expectations This agendum might be member-confidential. ACTION-12 Contact participants in previous interop testing, on Frederick Hirsch Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0018.html Review interop testing expectations: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/interop-interest/results 9. Test cases i) Regression tests - original XML Signature and Decryption Transform cases Action to review and summarize? ii) test defined in new C14N11 example (as updated) <http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509> iii) E01 - see ACTION-19 Agreed at F2F that no tests needed for E02-E05 iv) Action to review and summarize test for E06, test for base64 URI? Test exists but not well-defined? v) Action to summarize dditional tests? greg: test case for 1.0 as default see if 1.1 by mistake <hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:base is present <hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:id is present <fjh> thomas: generate sig over doc subset, must include c14n11 as final transform <fjh> greg: new generators not rely on default c14n <klanz2> Test case for conversion NodeSetData to OctetStreamData: <klanz2> Use case: Generate a signature having a reference with some xpath transform selecting NodeSetData <klanz2> then we add a XSLT transform that clearly needs OctetStreamData <klanz2> Check on verification: if the resulting signature actually made the use of c14n 1.1 explicit in the chain of transforms 10. Any other business Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> Scribe list ----------- Elisabetta Carrara Donald Eastlake Giles Hogben (expected) Konrad Lanz Peter Lipp Hal Lockhart Ram Mohan Anthony Nadalin Chris Nautiyal Rich Salz Daniel Schutzer Ed Simon Andrew Sullivan Panagiotis Trimintzios Tarun Tyagi Thomas Roessler (17 Apr 07) Greg Whitehead (F2F 2 May 07 am) Rob Miller (F2F 2 May 07 pm) Gregory Berezowsky (F2F 3 May 07 am) Sean Mullan (F2F 3 May 07 pm) Juan Carlos Cruellas (15 May 2007) Phillip Hallam-Baker (22 May 2007)
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 22:27:05 UTC