- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:56:25 +0200
- To: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
(This version fills in some additional information; no substantive
changes.)
22 May, 9-10am Eastern Time
(6-7am Pacific, 1500-1600 CET, 1600-1700 Crete)
See <http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/> for time in other time
zones.
Zakim Bridge:
+1.617.761.6200 conference code 965732# ('XMLSEC')
IRC Chat:
irc.w3.org (port 6665), #xmlsec
Web-based IRC (member-only):
<http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi>
Please note that attendance of XMLSEC WG telecons is restricted to
registered WG participants and persons invited by the chair.
Chair:
Thomas Roessler
Regrets:
Frederick Hirsch, Giles Hogben, Aleksey Sanin, Peter Lipp
1. Administrivia: scribe confirmation, next meeting
PHB is expected to scribe. The current scribe list is
at the end of this message.
Scribe Instructions:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/Scribe-Instructions.html
Next meeting: PROPOSED for 29 May, Thomas to chair, Giles to
scribe.
2. Review and approval of last meeting's minutes
http://www.w3.org/2007/05/15-xmlsec-minutes
3. Action item review
We'll review action items that don't tie in with another agendum.
For the full list of open actions, see:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/open
ACTION-5 Teach tracker about common aliases, on Thomas Roessler
[DONE]
ACTION-6 Share example for transform that depends on information
beyond the transform input nodeset, on Konrad Lanz [review status]
ACTION-22 Provide URI for additional algorithms, on Thomas
Roessler [DONE]
ACTION-26 draft CG note draft for submission to XML CG, on Thomas
Roessler [CONTINUE]
4. Workshop planning
ACTION-17 Draft CFP, on Thomas Roessler
Done:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/ws/cfp.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0013.html
ACTION-27 Put up WBS for known constraints in September/October,
on Thomas Roessler
Done:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/workshop-timing/results
The results of that survey suggest September 26/27 or September
25/26.
PROPOSED: To schedule the workshop for September 25/26.
We have hosting offers from Europe and the West Coast.
PROPOSED: To accept the hosting offer from BEA, San Jose.
5. Current status of drafts: C14N11 (from XML Core)
ACTION-25 Post red-line link for C14N11, on Frederick Hirsch
Done:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0028.html
Per last meeting's decision, we do not anticipate to send any further
feed-back to XML Core as a group.
XML Core's draft transition request:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007May/0040
6. Current status of drafts: DSig Core
Current draft:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/changes.html
ACTION-19 Get test case for E01, on Konrad Lanz
Review discussion of E05:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0006.html
and thread
7. Current status of drafts: Decryption Transform
Curent draft:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-decrypt.html
(I suspect that the following agenda items might be carried forward
to the next meeting.)
8. Interop testing, participation expectations
ACTION-12 Contact participants in previous interop testing, on
Frederick Hirsch
Done:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0018.html
ACTION 18 Send e-mail about interop testing dependencies with
Core, on Thomas Roessler
Done:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-xmlsec-maintwg/2007May/0024.html
Review interop testing expectations:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40279/interop-interest/results
Discussion about this agendum is likely to be declared
member-confidential.
9. Test cases
i) Regression tests - original XML Signature and Decryption
Transform cases Action to review and summarize?
ii) test defined in new C14N11 example (as updated)
<http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2007/05/CR-xml-c14n11-20070509>
iii) E01 - see ACTION-19 Agreed at F2F that no tests needed for
E02-E05
iv) Action to review and summarize test for E06, test for base64
URI? Test exists but not well-defined?
v) Action to summarize dditional tests?
greg: test case for 1.0 as default see if 1.1 by mistake
<hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:base is
present
<hal> test case which checks for correct sig when xml:id is present
<fjh> thomas: generate sig over doc subset, must include c14n11
as final transform
<fjh> greg: new generators not rely on default c14n
<klanz2> Test case for conversion NodeSetData to OctetStreamData:
<klanz2> Use case: Generate a signature having a reference with
some xpath transform selecting NodeSetData
<klanz2> then we add a XSLT transform that clearly needs
OctetStreamData
<klanz2> Check on verification: if the resulting signature
actually made the use of c14n 1.1 explicit in the chain of transforms
10.
Any other business
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Scribe list
-----------
Elisabetta Carrara
Donald Eastlake
Phillip Hallam-Baker (22 May 2007)
Giles Hogben
Konrad Lanz
Peter Lipp
Hal Lockhart
Ram Mohan
Anthony Nadalin
Chris Nautiyal
Rich Salz
Daniel Schutzer
Ed Simon
Andrew Sullivan
Panagiotis Trimintzios
Tarun Tyagi
Thomas Roessler (17 Apr 07)
Greg Whitehead (F2F 2 May 07 am)
Rob Miller (F2F 2 May 07 pm)
Gregory Berezowsky (F2F 3 May 07 am)
Sean Mullan (F2F 3 May 07 pm)
Juan Carlos Cruellas (15 May 2007)
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 08:56:34 UTC