- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:42:49 +0100
- To: "Rushforth, Peter" <Peter.Rushforth@NRCan-RNCan.gc.ca>
- Cc: "public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org" <public-xmlhypermedia@w3.org>
On 25/07/2012 16:35, David Carlisle wrote: > I can see that in application/mathml+xml there is an definition of > their meaning. You've mentioned mime types before but I think it's an important point that most XML vocabularies are not defined in terms of a mime type. The mime type is useful in some contexts (and MathML defined that one at MathML3 but it had happily gone for a decade without). One usually distinguishes Docbook from XHTML from TEI not by the mimetype it is served with, but rather as you would distinguish English from German or Fortran from C by looking at the terms used in the document or by some prior agreement of the language of communication. That's why it is easy to have an XHTML+MathML+SVG document even though a mime type can only refer to the document as a whole. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 15:43:14 UTC