public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org from December 2012 by thread

[Bug 18643] should 'annotF001' be valid? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 16181] should schZ014_b be valid? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 4148] SUN tests: dependency on float/double formatting bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 18639] expected result of "absolute-URI-3986-invalid-*" should be invalid bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 18507] should 'particlesZ033_g' be valid in 1.1? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 18856] Should 'particlesK006' be valid for XSD 1.1? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 4147] MS Particles tests: particlesV020 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 16161] disallowedSubst00503m3,4,5 should be invalid for XSD 1.1 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 18499] should 'over029.v01.xml' be valid? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 16180] should schZ014_a be valid? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 18640] test 's3_4_2_4si03s' of set 'defaultAttributesApply' valid? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 18636] expected result of test 'wild074.xsd' should be invalid bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 18641] should 'wild062.n3.xml' be valid? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

[Bug 4146] MS Element tests: elemZ026 bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 4 December 2012 00:54:56 UTC