[Bug 4680] Microsoft Element test elemZ027_c


------- Comment #1 from mike@saxonica.com  2007-06-21 11:29 -------
I fear you are right, despite the fact that the spec here is clearly bizarre. I
rather like MSMcQ's attempt to find a rationale: "Er.  Ah. Those who favored
the current design argued that it would be more useful this way".

Actually, I am not sure I have ever seen block="substitution" used in a real
live schema; it appears to be pretty useless either way. But conformance often
means doing things that are patently bonkers...

Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 11:29:54 UTC