- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:09:01 +0000
- To: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4681 Summary: Microsoft Errata10 test errF001 Product: XML Schema Test Suite Version: 2006-11-06 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Microsoft tests AssignedTo: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk ReportedBy: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com QAContact: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org The schema for the Microsoft Errata10 test (group="errF001";name="errF001") is described as valid in the metadata. I think that this schema is actually invalid. E2-35 [1] (the erratum this test is trying to test) was superseded by E2-66 [2] before XML Schema 1.0 2nd edition was released. Due to E2-66 the spec [3] now says: "If length is a member of {facets} then it is an error for maxLength to be a member of {facets} unless there is a type definition from which this one is derived by one or more restriction steps in which maxLength has the same {value} and length is not specified." I believe the simple type "st2" defined in errF001.xsd doesn't satisfy this condition because the base type definition doesn't have a maxLength facet. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-35 [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-66 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#length-coss
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 04:09:04 UTC