- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:09:01 +0000
- To: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
Summary: Microsoft Errata10 test errF001
Product: XML Schema Test Suite
Version: 2006-11-06
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Microsoft tests
AssignedTo: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
ReportedBy: mrglavas@ca.ibm.com
QAContact: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
The schema for the Microsoft Errata10 test (group="errF001";name="errF001") is
described as valid in the metadata. I think that this schema is actually
invalid. E2-35 [1] (the erratum this test is trying to test) was superseded by
E2-66 [2] before XML Schema 1.0 2nd edition was released. Due to E2-66 the spec
[3] now says: "If length is a member of {facets} then it is an error for
maxLength to be a member of {facets} unless there is a type definition from
which this one is derived by one or more restriction steps in which maxLength
has the same {value} and length is not specified." I believe the simple type
"st2" defined in errF001.xsd doesn't satisfy this condition because the base
type definition doesn't have a maxLength facet.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-35
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#E2-66
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#length-coss
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 04:09:04 UTC