- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:22:07 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <877fh2qfsw.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes:
> (B) An iteration of the sections that produces an empty sequence:
>
> why not empty parens to represent sink()
>
> $doc//section ! ()
When does this have value?
> we probably need to come up with a more realistic example.
>
> (C) 'replacement of sections'
>
> $doc ~ //section ! filter() ~
>
> Personally would like to avoid spending weeks/months/years discussing
> C) ... I observe that viewports has taken up a huge amount of mental
> capital for the WG over the years and while it is very useful I think
> trying to solve it to achieve parity in the language is a rathole best
> avoided.
My knee-jerk reaction is that XProc isn’t useful without
viewport/replace.
> I also would think ironing out data literals and templating could
> offer other routes for solving this. In any event, please ... let us
> timebox our efforts - I would propose 2 weeks (2 WG meetings) from
> today.
I don’t want it to become a time sync, but I’m not persuaded to let it
go. But we can do other things first, if that’s the best course.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:22:35 UTC