- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:22:07 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <877fh2qfsw.fsf@nwalsh.com>
James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes: > (B) An iteration of the sections that produces an empty sequence: > > why not empty parens to represent sink() > > $doc//section ! () When does this have value? > we probably need to come up with a more realistic example. > > (C) 'replacement of sections' > > $doc ~ //section ! filter() ~ > > Personally would like to avoid spending weeks/months/years discussing > C) ... I observe that viewports has taken up a huge amount of mental > capital for the WG over the years and while it is very useful I think > trying to solve it to achieve parity in the language is a rathole best > avoided. My knee-jerk reaction is that XProc isn’t useful without viewport/replace. > I also would think ironing out data literals and templating could > offer other routes for solving this. In any event, please ... let us > timebox our efforts - I would propose 2 weeks (2 WG meetings) from > today. I don’t want it to become a time sync, but I’m not persuaded to let it go. But we can do other things first, if that’s the best course. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation Phone: +1 512 761 6676 www.marklogic.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 21:22:35 UTC